How is War a Way to Settle in Agreement if it Only Brings More Bloodshed and Unsettlement? How Can Something so Violent Bring Ease and Treaty?

War is mistaken as a battle for freedom and peace as it is just a horrifying battle. Many have lost their lives in war that it just creates more hatred in their loved one's hearts. War isn't a way to settle in agreement. Our government thinks it is however it isn't. Sometimes it is necessary to go to war but only if we are sure it cannot be settled through conversation. For example, back during the American Revolution it was necessary to go to war. Although the colonists didn't notice that this decision would show up as an opportunity to go to war. Young boys began to think that being in the war was an offer you couldn't resist whereas others didn't want. Jonathan felt like those who thought it was an irresistible offer. His friends and him would day-dream about being a soldier and wearing that uniform. Jonathan and those young fellows thought it was about the marches and parades, not war strategies or bloodshed. In this case something so violent as war brought freedom but in every dilemma that crosses someones way will it succeed or worsen the situation? Indeed, war has a positive and negative to it just like everything does. From my point of view war is not the perfect nor the right way to succeed in a situation, given Jonathan's position as a young thirteen yr old boy who has now joined the army.